alanfleming.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the alanfleming.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host alanfleming.org. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is ICUK Computing Services Limited .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

skip to content insert witticism here not blogging. it’s inter­est­ing to see how the world has moved on in terms of com­mu­nic­a­tion. even in long­form, most people will post on some­thing like medi­um. this blog is an ana­chron­ism: but one i’m not will­ing to turn off <i>quite</i> yet. author alan fleming posted on july 9, 2018 categories miscellaneous leave a comment on not blogging. calculate your open university law degree classification some­time ago i pos­ted a link to anoth­er blog con­tain­ing a link to a degree clas­si­fic­a­tion cal­cu­lat­or for open uni­ver­sity degrees. how­ever, the way the clas­si­fic­a­tion is cal­cu­lated for ou law degrees is slightly dif­fer­ent. luck­ily, it’s pretty simple to work out. the ou law degree con­sists of 4 man­dat­ory courses: w200, w201, w300 and w301. for w200 and w201, mul­tiply your grade (1−−4) for each course by 60. for w300 and w301, mul­tiply it by 120 (to reflect the degree of sig­ni­fic­ance for these courses). take those four num­bers and add them togeth­er. their sum will give your class of degree: 630 or few­er — first class hon­ours 631−−900 — upper second class hon­ours 901−−1170 — lower second class hon­ours 1171 or more — third class hon­ours there is one trick to this. if you have a poor res­ult in either w200 or w201, you can replace half of it with a bet­ter res­ult in one of the law short courses: w221, w222, w223 or w224. for example: grade 3 pass of w200: 3 × 60 = 180 points. grade 3 pass of w200 and a grade 1 pass of w223: 3 × 30 plus 1 × 30 = 120 points that can be enough to pull you up a grade! just for com­plete­ness — while you need to sit 360 points’ worth of courses, it is (with the excep­tion noted above) only the 240 points of the man­dat­ory law courses that count to your law degree clas­si­fic­a­tion. source: (and a really use­ful read for all ou law stu­dents) choos­ing your path to an open uni­ver­sity law degree: a guide author alan fleming posted on november 1, 2011 november 23, 2011 categories miscellaneous case comment: fallows v harkers transport (royal and sun alliance, vehicle insurance) mr fal­lows’ car was dam­aged by a vehicle owned by the defend­ants. liab­il­ity was not an issue. mr. fal­lows’ vehicle was insured by roy­al and sun alli­ance, who sought to recov­er their costs from the defendant’s insurers. the costs were £1825.53. not a large sum. how­ever, the defend­ants objec­ted. the reas­on for the objec­tion was that roy­al and sun alli­ance arranged repair via a wholly-owned sub­si­di­ary, which then con­trac­ted with a sub­con­tract­or, who actu­ally repaired the vehicle. the sub­con­tract­or billed the sub­si­di­ary the sum of £1542.78. the sub­si­di­ary added on fur­ther costs, and billed roy­al and sun alli­ance. in rom­ford county court, the defend­ants ques­tioned the sum claimed. it was held that, giv­en the duty to mit­ig­ate, the best evid­ence of reas­on­able cost of repairs was that which rsa’s sub­si­di­ary nego­ti­ated with the sub­con­tract­or. there was no evid­ence that rsa itself could only nego­ti­ate a high­er price. while admin­is­tra­tion costs have been allowed by the courts in the past, there are no decisions allow­ing them to a sub­rog­ated insurer, let alone a sub­rog­ated insurer’s sub­sid­ary. and in coun­ter­bal­ance, there are decisions where admin­is­tra­tion costs have been dis­al­lowed. the judge (platt j) said: since rsaarl is wholly owned by rsa the effect of these extra charges if they are paid by defend­ants is simply to boost rsa group’s profits bey­ond the actu­al cost of repair by the mar­gins inser­ted by rsaarl. i can find no basis in law for say­ing that this is a course of action which a claimant insurer is entitled to take [..]. on the evid­ence the defend­ant has clearly estab­lished a fail­ure to mit­ig­ate on the part of the claimant. now that this judg­ment is pub­lic, the util­ity of this busi­ness arrange­ment to rsa is prob­ably moot. oth­er insurers could use the same mod­el. this how­ever was found to be likely to lead to an increase in costs to the insured mem­bers of the pub­lic of some 25%. rsa were held liable in costs to the defend­ant — exceed­ingly unusu­al in a small claim. even though they were the claimant, they almost com­pletely failed to com­ply with pre–action pro­tocol and with the court–ordered dis­cov­ery pro­cess. for example, the exist­ence of a form­al invoice from the repairer to rsa’s sub­si­di­ary was not dis­closed, even once its exist­ence had become appar­ent dur­ing the tri­al. per­mis­sion was giv­en to appeal. judg­ment in the case can be found on bailii at fal­lows v. hark­ers trans­port (a firm) [2011] ew misc 16 . author alan fleming posted on september 15, 2011 september 15, 2011 categories comment , law 1 comment on case comment: fallows v harkers transport (royal and sun alliance, vehicle insurance) your data in the cloud is not secure from the us government data stor­age in the cloud is clearly the where things are mov­ing just now. giv­en the pleth­ora of devices people have — com­puters at home, laptops and tab­lets on the move, smart­phones in the pock­et, it makes per­fect sense for all of a person’s devices to use a single, com­mon repos­it­ory for shared inform­a­tion. ser­vices such as apple’s forth­com­ing icloud at the domest­ic level, and commonly–used ser­vices such as google’s google apps, salesforce.com and microsoft’s office 365 all store your data in their own clouds. you’d think that this would be done with respect to data pro­tec­tion laws. wrong. if the usa wants your data, the usa gets it. my friends simon bis­son and mary branscombe have the details: regard­less of european pri­vacy dir­ect­ives and the uk data pro­tec­tion act, the us see the patriot act over­rid­ing these for us com­pan­ies and eu sub­si­di­ar­ies of us com­pan­ies: that means that us gov­ern­ment can (under the aus­pices of the act) request the data of any indi­vidu­al or com­pany that’s using us-owned or hos­ted ser­vices, no mat­ter where that data is actu­ally being held. it doesn’t mat­ter if you’ve geo-locked your data, and it only resides in european data centres, it can still be requisi­tioned and taken to the us. yes, it’s an issue of nation­al secur­ity, but when res­ults can be found by machine learn­ing and trawl­ing massive data sets (the lar­ger the bet­ter), there’s a tempta­tion for gov­ern­ments to take all they can and more. undoubtedly this will lead to much hand–wringing in the eu par­lia­ment. how­ever, what can be done? it is unlikely that the usa will give up their powers. there­fore, the only solu­tion is in the hands of indi­vidu­als and com­pan­ies wish­ing to use cloud ser­vices — only use cloud ser­vices from wholly–eu–owned com­pan­ies host­ing your data inside the eu. while the leg­al pro­tec­tions you will have in those cir­cum­stances are not huge, they are bet­ter than none at all. oh — an after­thought. how happy do you now feel, if per­haps you have just giv­en a whole heap of your per­son­al inform­a­tion to google, dur­ing the google plus sign–up pro­cess? author alan fleming posted on july 14, 2011 july 14, 2011 categories comment , law back up your information in google — google takeout wor­ried about the amount of inform­a­tion you have stored in google ser­vices? fear not. just launched today is google takeout — which allows you to take a loc­al backup of (so far, some of) the inform­a­tion stored in sev­er­al of the google ser­vices. it’s not yet full–featured: it only allows backup from google buzz, con­tact and circles, picasa web albums and from your google pro­file. but the data lib­er­a­tion front prom­ise to add the abil­ity to back up oth­er google ser­vices over time. this is their blog post announ­cing the ser­vice. remem­ber: backup early, backup often. author alan fleming posted on june 28, 2011 june 28, 2011 categories technical w223: company law — got a distinction! that was unex­pec­ted! i got noti­f

URL analysis for alanfleming.org

https://alanfleming.org/#content
https://alanfleming.org/about/
https://alanfleming.org/category/studying/
https://alanfleming.org/contact/
https://alanfleming.org/category/comment/
https://alanfleming.org/category/gym/
https://alanfleming.org/2011/07/your-data-in-the-cloud-is-not-secure-from-the-us-government/
https://alanfleming.org/category/misc/
https://alanfleming.org/2011/11/calculate-your-open-university-law-degree-classification/
https://alanfleming.org/author/alan/
https://alanfleming.org/2011/06/w223-company-law-got-a-distinction/
https://alanfleming.org/page/9/
https://alanfleming.org/2011/01/how-changing-my-bedding-helped-me-at-the-gym/comment-page-1/#comment-298
https://alanfleming.org/2011/06/calculate-your-open-university-degree-classification/
https://alanfleming.org/caveat/
www8.open.ac.uk
zdnet.co.uk
www3.open.ac.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS alanfleming.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

  REGISTERED unknown

DOMAIN

  NAME alanfleming.org

NSERVER

  NS2.WIZARDS.CO.UK 217.146.99.22

  NS1.WIZARDS.CO.UK 217.146.107.3

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .